U.S. Had Intel on Chemical Strike Before It Was Launched

((((while not condoning whatever really happened in Syria the other week, and I do not condone the use of chemical weapons, to help put this "moralistic" stance POTUS is taking, I look back and remember WW2 and the fact we used the atomic bomb--twice--and we dropped Agent Orange on citizens and the military in Vietnam, and that these 'love bombs' and missles we send at whatever targets these day...they carry depleted uranium which contaminated the ground with radioactivity that will be there for years, slowly killing the citizen and causing birth defects--so do we really have a moral ground to stand on?--alexis..just asking))))

American intelligence agencies had indications three days beforehand that the Syrian regime was poised to launch a lethal chemical attack that killed more than a thousand people and has set the stage for a possible U.S. military strike on Syria. 

The disclosure -- part of a larger U.S. intelligence briefing on Syria's chemical attacks -- raises all sorts of uncomfortable questions for the American government. First and foremost: What, if anything, did it do to notify the Syrian opposition of the pending attack? 

In a call with reporters Friday afternoon, senior administration officials did not address whether this information was shared with rebel groups in advance of the attack. A White House spokeswoman declined to comment on whether the information had been shared. 

But at least some members of the Syrian opposition are already lashing out at the U.S. government for not acting ahead of time to prevent the worst chemical attack in a quarter-century. "If you knew, why did you take no action?" asked Dlshad Othman, a Syrian activist and secure-communications expert who has recently relocated to the United States. He added that none of his contacts had any sort of prior warning about the nerve gas assault -- although such an attack was always a constant fear. 

Razan Zaitouneh, an opposition activist in the town of Douma, one of the towns hit in the Aug. 21 attack, said she had no early indication of a major chemical attack. "Even the moment [the attack hit], we thought it was as usual, limited and not strong," she told The Cable in an instant message. That only changed when "we started to hear about the number of injuries." 

"It's unbelievable that they did nothing to warn people or try to stop the regime before the crime," Zaitouneh added. 

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/